I grew up reading the John Carter books by Edgar Rice Burroughs. (Along with Tarzan and most other works he produced.) I read the comics. Hell, I even played the strategy board game. So when I heard a movie came out I was excited. Life kept me busy and I never got to watch it until two nights ago.
I had heard the critics panned it. No one I knew had actually seen it. I figured what the hell. DL and watch it.
It wasn't that bad. It wasn't a great movie. It was disappointing in many ways. Yet it wasn't that bad. Not as bad a the critics made it out to be. My main problems with it;
It changed the initial book/story too much.
The Tharks didn't look muscular or tall enough.
The tattoos instead of armbands/jewelry.
Little things like that.
Overall, it is worth watching if you don't have anything to better to do.
Wednesday, June 5, 2013
Tuesday, June 4, 2013
A Crack in the Ford Case
CBC NewsWorld just reported that the much touted video showing Rob Ford smoking crack is gone. The head of Gawker, the head Gawker?, has been heard from. According to his go between with the video owners it no longer exists. It is gone. If it ever existed.
We have the word of three "reporters" that the video existed and Ford was on it. Yet no video. The Gawker has raised over $200,000 to buy the video which now can't be found.
Bravo media fucktards. I refuse to refer to them as reporters any more. You ran your mouths off without having the actual video in your possession to back you up. You have set yourselves up for a nasty libel suit that you should lose. You tarred a man's reputation with no proof ... just your "word" that the video is real and Ford is really in it. And people wonder why the media has a bad name?
I am not a Ford fan but I don't like to see shit like this happen. The Gawker should be forced to donate the money they raised to the charity of Rob Ford's choice at the LEAST.
I hope he sues the fucktards.
We have the word of three "reporters" that the video existed and Ford was on it. Yet no video. The Gawker has raised over $200,000 to buy the video which now can't be found.
Bravo media fucktards. I refuse to refer to them as reporters any more. You ran your mouths off without having the actual video in your possession to back you up. You have set yourselves up for a nasty libel suit that you should lose. You tarred a man's reputation with no proof ... just your "word" that the video is real and Ford is really in it. And people wonder why the media has a bad name?
I am not a Ford fan but I don't like to see shit like this happen. The Gawker should be forced to donate the money they raised to the charity of Rob Ford's choice at the LEAST.
I hope he sues the fucktards.
Friday, May 24, 2013
Rob Ford Crack Addict
When did the standards of journalism sink so low that supposedly reputable media outlets would make allegations based on video that they (3 "reporters") either only saw a short clip of or never saw at all?
Is Mayor Ford an asshole? At times yeah. Is he a crack addict? I am looking at a picture of him as I type this and find it hard to believe that someone his size is a crack addict.
He is being attacked in the media based on ... what? A video no one can see but the 3 "reporters" who saw it claim it is legitimate. BUT they need some rubes to donate money in order to raise $200,000 to buy the video. I wonder what happens to the money if they can't buy it?
Rob Ford is in a catch 22 situation. If he speaks out against the claim he gives more fuel to the "media" who are using it to attack him. If he doesn't they claim his silence is proof. Tough position to be in.
So far he has said he is not an addict and there is no video. What else can he say?
Isn't the onus on these "reporters" to prove their assertion? Shouldn't the media have actually had the video to use as proof before reporting this? Before trying to destroy someone's career? Their life?
Is Mayor Ford an asshole? At times yeah. Is he a crack addict? I am looking at a picture of him as I type this and find it hard to believe that someone his size is a crack addict.
He is being attacked in the media based on ... what? A video no one can see but the 3 "reporters" who saw it claim it is legitimate. BUT they need some rubes to donate money in order to raise $200,000 to buy the video. I wonder what happens to the money if they can't buy it?
Rob Ford is in a catch 22 situation. If he speaks out against the claim he gives more fuel to the "media" who are using it to attack him. If he doesn't they claim his silence is proof. Tough position to be in.
So far he has said he is not an addict and there is no video. What else can he say?
Isn't the onus on these "reporters" to prove their assertion? Shouldn't the media have actually had the video to use as proof before reporting this? Before trying to destroy someone's career? Their life?
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
Shit Morons Say ... when shooting their mouth off.
"I watched the Benghazi thing with great interest, Sean. I think it is one of the worst incidences, frankly, that I can recall in my career."
The above comment was made by Dick Cheney to Sean Hannity on the FOX show Hannity on Monday.
I guess Dick has memory problems. During his career 9-11 happened among many other things. Yet this is the worst he has seen? Maybe he meant to say worst he has seen not under a Republican Government?
What a dick.
The above comment was made by Dick Cheney to Sean Hannity on the FOX show Hannity on Monday.
I guess Dick has memory problems. During his career 9-11 happened among many other things. Yet this is the worst he has seen? Maybe he meant to say worst he has seen not under a Republican Government?
What a dick.
Monday, May 13, 2013
Shit Morons Say ... when making an analogy.
"It is makes me feel like those 3 women who were held captive for 10 years."
I work with a guy that keeps raising the bar for stupid comments. We (Him, D-man, Ash (a woman), and myself) were talking about a regulation (Government) that was brought to our attention by management. It applies to our work place and can lead to a fine of $1000 and/or 1 year in jail. Plus the company would be fined $25,000. IF the regulation was violated.
This caused ... hmmm if I would like to use his real nickname, because the story behind it is HILARIOUS ... but I won't ... let's call him Glimmer. Glimmer felt that once again the oppressive jackboot of authority was stepping on our neck. He tried to make an analogy to show how it made him felt so he said;
"You know, the way they keep regulating us makes me feel like those 3 women in the US that were held captive for 10 years!"
Ash's jaw dropped. D-man was just staring at Glimmer. I shook my head and said.
"You are REALLY trying to use an analogy that working her compares to what those women went through? Seriously?"
Glimmer stepped back and stammered "Yes. It is that oppressive."
"You are fucking moron." I said. "Those women were chained, raped, tortured, and treated like dirt. You were told that if you swear on the radio and a Government organization hears it you COULD be punished. Next you will be comparing working here to a nazi concentration camp. That is a HORRIBLE analogy."
"I think it is a good one. " He replied.
The others shook their head no and said it was a horrible analogy.
Glimmer walked away shrugging his shoulders. He just didn't understand why it was wrong. The rest of us just shared a moment of shocked silence at his stupidity.
Ash said "Now you see what I have to work with every day."
"I will tell you about the Christmas Party one day." I said. "I didn't think he could get stupider, but he has."
I work with a guy that keeps raising the bar for stupid comments. We (Him, D-man, Ash (a woman), and myself) were talking about a regulation (Government) that was brought to our attention by management. It applies to our work place and can lead to a fine of $1000 and/or 1 year in jail. Plus the company would be fined $25,000. IF the regulation was violated.
This caused ... hmmm if I would like to use his real nickname, because the story behind it is HILARIOUS ... but I won't ... let's call him Glimmer. Glimmer felt that once again the oppressive jackboot of authority was stepping on our neck. He tried to make an analogy to show how it made him felt so he said;
"You know, the way they keep regulating us makes me feel like those 3 women in the US that were held captive for 10 years!"
Ash's jaw dropped. D-man was just staring at Glimmer. I shook my head and said.
"You are REALLY trying to use an analogy that working her compares to what those women went through? Seriously?"
Glimmer stepped back and stammered "Yes. It is that oppressive."
"You are fucking moron." I said. "Those women were chained, raped, tortured, and treated like dirt. You were told that if you swear on the radio and a Government organization hears it you COULD be punished. Next you will be comparing working here to a nazi concentration camp. That is a HORRIBLE analogy."
"I think it is a good one. " He replied.
The others shook their head no and said it was a horrible analogy.
Glimmer walked away shrugging his shoulders. He just didn't understand why it was wrong. The rest of us just shared a moment of shocked silence at his stupidity.
Ash said "Now you see what I have to work with every day."
"I will tell you about the Christmas Party one day." I said. "I didn't think he could get stupider, but he has."
Sunday, April 28, 2013
RBC: How A Fucktard Apologises.
Damn, I forgot I wrote this, and it is a tad ... alot ... out of date. But what the kimchi. :)
Gord Nixon, CEO of Royal Bank of Canada, has released an open letter to Canadians. NOW, he is sorry for the foreign worker controversy.
On Monday he brayed that RBC had done nothing wrong. It was all the fault of some company (iGATE) that RBC used to outsource work. As I said then TECHNICALLY he is right.
People saw that claim for the BS it is. Nixon tried to chickenshit his way out of any responsibility by using a technicality. Fucktard.
Mind you, he STILL tried to use the technicality to brush off the criticism.
"While we are compliant with the regulations, the debate has been about something else," Nixon wrote.
He is still trying to deflect responsibility while trying to tell people that he is listening to their concerns. Proof is in the pudding Gord. And people are watching you now.
Gord Nixon, CEO of Royal Bank of Canada, has released an open letter to Canadians. NOW, he is sorry for the foreign worker controversy.
On Monday he brayed that RBC had done nothing wrong. It was all the fault of some company (iGATE) that RBC used to outsource work. As I said then TECHNICALLY he is right.
People saw that claim for the BS it is. Nixon tried to chickenshit his way out of any responsibility by using a technicality. Fucktard.
Mind you, he STILL tried to use the technicality to brush off the criticism.
"While we are compliant with the regulations, the debate has been about something else," Nixon wrote.
He is still trying to deflect responsibility while trying to tell people that he is listening to their concerns. Proof is in the pudding Gord. And people are watching you now.
Saturday, April 27, 2013
On Gun Control in the US.
A friend shared a meme on Facebook about gun control in the US.
It is pretty spot on.
I always had problems with people spewing out "Guns don't kill people. People kill people." It always seemed like they were missing a sentence such as "Guns just make it easier." at the end.
It is pretty spot on.
I always had problems with people spewing out "Guns don't kill people. People kill people." It always seemed like they were missing a sentence such as "Guns just make it easier." at the end.
Labels:
American Culture,
American Politics,
Facebook,
Gun Control,
Memes,
USA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
